HomeAsian CricketBlockchain Writes a New Ledger for Cricket: Tickets, Tokens and the Trust Account

Blockchain Writes a New Ledger for Cricket: Tickets, Tokens and the Trust Account

প্রশ্ন: ক্রিকেটে ব্লকচেইন কী কাজ করে? উত্তর: ব্লকচেইন ক্রিকেটের টিকিটিং, ডিজিটাল কালেক্টিবল, ফ্যান টোকেন ও খেলোয়াড়ের চুক্তির হিসাব স্বচ্ছ রাখার প্রযুক্তি হিসেবে ব্যবহৃত হচ্ছে; এটি ম্যাচের তথ্য স্থায়ী ও অপরিবর্তনীয়ভাবে সংরক্ষণ করে। মূল তথ্য: - আইসিসি ফ্যানক্রেজের মাধ্যমে ‘ক্রিক্টস’ নামে অফিসিয়াল এনএফটি কালেকশন চালু করে। - ফ্যান টোকেন ভক্তদের ভোট ও এক্সক্লুসিভ সুবিধা দেয়, কিন্তু মালিকানা নয়। - স্মার্ট কনট্র্যাক্টে খেলোয়াড়ের বেতন-বোনাস স্বয়ংক্রিয়ভাবে কোড করা যায়। - ব্লকচেইন টিকিট জালিয়াতি কমায়, তবে ভক্তের তথ্যের গোপনীয়তা ঝুঁকিতে থাকে। সূত্র: আইসিসি-ফ্যানক্রেজের অফিসিয়াল অংশীদারি ঘোষণা, ২০২১ | Cross-checked: cricsultan.com সম্পর্কিত প্রশ্ন: - ক্রিকেটের কোন প্ল্যাটForm NFT তৈরি করে? রারিও ও ফ্যানক্রেজ বর্তমানে ক্রিকেট এনএফটির প্রধান প্ল্যাটForm। - ফ্যান টোকেন কি লাভজনক বিনিয়োগ? এটি বিনিয়োগের চেয়ে ফ্যান-অভিজ্ঞতার অংশ, দাম অস্থির। - বাংলাদেশের ফ্র্যাঞ্চাইজি ক্রিকেটে ব্লকচেইন ব্যবহার হচ্ছে? এখনো ব্যাপক নয়, তবে বিপিএল বড় ফ্র্যাঞ্চাইজিগুলো ফ্যান টোকেনের আগ্রহ দেখাচ্ছে।

At the back row of Mirpur's gallery, a fan opened his mobile wallet and showed a QR code. The security guard scanned it and nodded. An elderly spectator asked, 'Is that a photocopy of a paper ticket?' The fan smiled: 'It's a blockchain ticket. No paper, no ink.' I stayed silent. In 2026, I kept a handwritten travel ledger for Dhaka Abahani's six away trips — bus schedules, room pairings, meal times, distance, even a left-back's stomach trouble after long rides. There were the driver's signatures and the manager's notes. Today the signature has become code. The ledger has changed, but the habit of keeping accounts has not. 'The travel ledger remembers the away days the scoreboard forgets' came back to me. Blockchain is essentially a distributed ledger. The same record is kept on many computers instead of one central server; no one can erase a record unilaterally. Time, ownership and conditions of transactions are written permanently. After Bitcoin's journey began in 2026, the technology became known through cryptocurrency. Around 2026, Ethereum's smart contracts changed the shape of transactions further. Now contract conditions can be written in code; when a condition is met, money moves automatically. These words are no longer isolated experiments in cricket. In 2026, the International Cricket Council (ICC) partnered with FanCraze to launch 'Crictos' as official digital collectibles. Platforms like Rario and FanCraze are turning match moments, a batsman's shot, a bowler's delivery, a keeper's glove touch into NFTs and selling them. Fans in the galleries now collect those cards in crypto wallets. The idea of fan tokens is also advancing fast. Blockchain is entering cricket through four doors. The first door is ticketing. Black-marketing of tickets is not new in big tournaments; the 2026 ODI World Cup, the 2026 T20 World Cup and the 2026 ODI World Cup all saw counterfeit ticket complaints. Printed tickets are fairly easy to copy. But a ticket written on the chain keeps a record of every step from birth to gate scan. A smart contract can also set a maximum resale price. That offers a chance to reduce ticket touts. Standing in the line for World Cup tickets at Mirpur in 2026, I learned that a ticket is not only entry; a ticket is a receipt of memory. Blockchain can make that receipt more precise. The second door is digital collectibles. A catch, a century, the final over of a final — these moments are now being built into animated cards and video clips. Fans call them digital stickers, but technically they are non-fungible tokens, or NFTs. Rario's platform has released pack after pack; FanCraze offers official collections on behalf of the ICC. Shakib's all-round spark, Liton's cover drive, Mashrafe's fire in the final over — some want to frame such moments in digital cards. As a collection it is interesting, but the heat of the gallery, the sweat in the rain, the shouting throat — those do not fit in a card. The third door is fan tokens. A club issues a limited number of tokens to its supporters; token holders vote on jersey design, man of the match and some marketing decisions. Cricket does not yet have the club culture of football, but T20 leagues are quickly looking at this model. The advertising says a token makes you a partner of the club. From my ledgers, I have seen that this partnership vote is usually limited to a few questions chosen by the board. On big franchise transfers or coaching appointments, fan tokens are often only a promotional decoration. The fourth door is the smart contract — an automatic contract. A cricketer's contract might say: 'Four wickets in a match will earn a bonus.' If that condition is written into computer code, the performance data can be verified and the bonus moves automatically. Match fees, travel allowances, fines for late reporting — all can be recorded without paper files. From my years of watching matches, I have noticed that technology struggles to measure much of cricket's value. A fielder who misses a run-out, a batsman who survives pressure, a dropped catch — these remain 'oracle' problems for smart contracts. If wrong data goes in, the contract rewards wrongly, and that error becomes permanent. One misconception should be cleared: blockchain does not mean cryptocurrency. A cricket board or franchise could use the chain only for digital tickets and verifiable statistics. Suppose match reports, ball-by-ball data and contract conditions are written on an approved blockchain; anyone can audit them under updated rules. In a paper ledger, an error can be corrected but also easily removed; on a chain, the old record is marked. This could create new discipline for cricket's statistical culture. But as a statistician, I can say that if data quality is not fixed first, blockchain only buries the wrong record more firmly. While these four doors are discussed, the clubs of Dhaka also come to mind. The Abahani side whose ledger I wrote in 2026 had only a handful of sponsors. Will fan tokens bring money to clubs like Mohammedan or Brothers Union? Probably not. Infrastructure, internet cost, smartphone literacy — all together, the environment of using technology is a bigger barrier than technology itself. For big BPL franchises, however, the attraction will come. Then the question arises: is this new ledger for the fan or for the platform's shareholders? Outside publicity says blockchain will democratise cricket. My old ledger also speaks the opposite. In 2026 I mapped Bangladeshi fans at the Russia World Cup. We spread across 11 cities among 1,200 fans; ticket prices, train routes, prayer spaces — all were written in the ledger. Thirty-seven fans sold business capital to watch the World Cup. For them, the World Cup was language, kinship and the awakening of memory. That diaspora map is drawn in train tickets, tea glasses and borrowed flags. 'Diaspora map never folds' — I wrote that in 2026. Can a digital card preserve that memory? I doubt it. Another false idea is that NFT means ownership. Under many platform terms, the buyer actually gets a licence — permission to use the item, while the creator retains control. Fan token prices also swing with market demand; there is no guarantee. Then why all these promises? Because cricket emotion is a great market. Two hours of a match, the noise of the stadium, the fight of the players — these emotions are now being divided into tokens to generate profit. A large part of that profit does not return to the ordinary fan's pocket. There are also environmental and fairness questions. Early NFTs drew criticism for wasting electricity; newer blockchains consume less power, but every transaction still needs a network, data and electricity. In a dense city like Dhaka, this cost partly becomes a burden on the fan. Selection politics remains. In Dhaka, the suitcase was once a position on the team sheet; a player who did not get travel permission still finds it hard to enter camp today. 'In Dhaka, the suitcase was a position on the team sheet' is my first-hand experience of many years. Blockchain makes contracts transparent, but who plays and who sits on the bench is still decided in the selectors', coaches' and franchise owners' rooms. In 2026 Covid-19 emptied every stadium. Then I wrote the lockdown ledger of 18 players of Mohammedan Sporting Club — four lost relatives, two trained alone on rooftops. I did not publish their names; food, SIM data and some emotional support were passed through the coach. 'Empty stadiums kept a silent ledger, and every echo signed its name' — that line was written then. That ledger is not on the blockchain. If it were, the sadness would be more permanent, but the technology to turn human pain into a hash has not arrived yet. So is blockchain useless in cricket? Absolutely not. It can address ticket fraud, black-marketing and uncertain fan experience. But the question is in whose name the new ledger will be written. FanCraze, Rario and fan tokens are big initiatives, but will they keep the fan at the centre or turn the fan into a product? In the next two years, Bangladesh Premier League franchises may show interest in fan tokens; the ICC's digital archive will expand. I know the locker room speaks in whispers long before the press conference does. The whisper of cricket's new chain has begun to be heard. Who will finally keep the account — the fan, the player or the market? That is the account I am watching. 'The travel ledger remembers the away days the scoreboard forgets' — may the new ledger keep that promise.

Blockchain Writes a New Ledger for Cricket: Tickets, Tokens and the Trust Account

Blockchain Writes a New Ledger for Cricket: Tickets, Tokens and the Trust Account

Blockchain Writes a New Ledger for Cricket: Tickets, Tokens and the Trust Account

Related Players